12/18/07

i havent much to say but for the consistency's sake, i figured i would throw a post out there. ive been thinking about how feminism can be used monolitically as a crutch, maybe like most -isms get used as crutches to an over-simplification. this maybe not sound coherent, but hear me out. those who stride forth and proclaim ardently their affiliation and dedication to feminism (myself included) find a hard time understanding when women (and men for that matter) do not take on the same points of view. and furthermore, it can be those who are so resolute in their beliefs that fail to effectively translate the theoretical and discursive underpinnings of their stances. extremists, though not radicals, can be bad news bears when it comes to a productive conversation. advocates of feminism who fail to recognize the vitality of different feminisms make coalitions impossible.

now i am not just speaking of the obvious tensions that evoke broad discussions multiculturalism vs. universalism. i mean to look more specifically at how my own opinions and beliefs have evolved on a very personal level. i think its valid to say that people can identify with parties and movements and theories that have a definite and concrete set of questions and answers. example : the democratic party is like a tangible entity, hence the availbility of such a party base. its like subscribing to the template. i see this as the most flagrant failure of those who claim their 'liberal' status. maybe that is what im talking about, im thinking about the ways in which we subscribe to the templates of 'American' feminism without turning the critical lens on the racism and classism that pervades it. but then we get back into the world of isms and ists. i need a means of conceptualization that does not find itself stuck in poststructuralism or feminism or socialism etc. etc. i guess my problem is that its so easy to espose something as doctrine without even needing to understand more than its basic pillars. but maybe thats what makes things reachable. and then we have to include the ideas of agency and access.

yea, this post isnt coherent at all. itd do us better to have a conversation. i guess my point is that in my younger days i found strength in the title of a feminist but more recently, i find more solace in the notion that feminism and feminists are hardly coherent and collectively consolidated.

just something ive been thinking about. hope all is well rounding out '07!