Saturday, March 31, 2007

WACK


WACK: ART AND THE FEMINIST REVOLUTION: 1965-1980

http://www.moca.org/wack/













This exhibition is going to be amazing! From March 4th until July 16th 2007 the Geffen Contemporary at MOCA will be hosting a wide arrange of events and lectures. Lectures include Lucy Lippard (author of Pink Glass Swan: Selected Feminist Essays on Art), Lorraine O'Grady, and a book signing with Judy Chicago, an amazing feminist artist and was also featured in this season's "Bitch" magazine. On March 3rd the opening consisted of a performance by JD Samson and Johanna Fateman of Le Tigre! So if you're in Southern California you don't want to miss this. If you can't make it to the exhibition, at least check out the website. It has plenty of videos and podcasts and photographs of the artworks. ENJOY!


During the late 1960s and early ’70s, feminism fundamentally changed contemporary art practice, critiquing its assumptions and radically altering its structures and methodologies. WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution is predicated on the notion that gender was and remains fundamental to the organization of culture, and that a contemporary understanding of the feminist in art must necessarily look to the late 1960s and ‘70s. While the American feminist art movement coalesced in the late 1960s in the United States and is embedded within the exhibition, this international survey of 120 artists, activists, filmmakers, writers, teachers, and thinkers necessarily moves beyond the now-canonical list of American feminist artists to include women of other geographies, formal approaches, socio-political alliances, and critical and theoretical positions. This exhibition argues for simultaneous feminisms internationally that together and retrospectively can be viewed as the most influential movement in postwar contemporary art.

The exclamatory title of the exhibition is intended to recall the bold idealism that characterized the feminist movement during its second wave, as well as the acronyms of activist groups that protested institutions of all kinds beginning in the late 1960s. For many of the artists in WACK!, feminism often coexisted with political engagement on other fronts such as race, class, and sexual orientation that, at times, superseded feminism as the dominant discourse within which they preferred to situate their work. Many artists’ imagery is explicitly feminist in its foregrounding of the body, personal narrative, and biography. While some artists embraced a conceptual idiom, others explored family histories and narratives of subjugation; still others worked abstractly and obliquely exploring themes of gender. For artists working in cultural contexts where there was no language of feminism or feminist art, their work can retrospectively be read in feminist terms.

The themes that structure the exhibition and publication were imagined in various ways. Some function historically while others are formally inspired, some according to the ways that women artists organized in order to maximize the impact of the statements they were trying to make. This brochure is intended as a guide, providing one narrative through the exhibition and a tool for organizing the artwork you will see and experience.

Some opening thoughts

hey all. =)

as this is my first post, just wanted to kick it off with a couple questions:

first, have any of you heard anything about the book entitled Pinay Power: Peminist Critical Theory ? (or the term "Peminism" in general?

ive been feelin some Filipino love burning in the ol' soul lately, so i did a little search on Amazon, and came up with this gem.

the folks at Amazon describe it as :

a collection of peminist (Filipina American feminist) cultural criticism by and about Filipina/Americans. Featuring essays by scholars and writers in the fields of decolonization, globalization, and transnationalism, this volume brings together for the first time critical work by Pinays of different generations and varying political and personal perspectives to chart the history of the Filipina experience. This groundbreaking collection serves as an antidote to the overly patriarchal and cultural nationalist stance of both Filipino American and Asian American scholarship and is an important corrective to the erasure and invisibility of Filipina American voices. This is an essential collection for scholars and writers concerned with cultural and political activism, particularly in literary, Asian American, and women's studies.

So...I'm extremely intrigued because the use of the letter "P" in place of "F" in Peminist comes across as poking fun at the inability of many Filipino/ newly immigrated Filipino-Americans to pronounce f's, yet it is used in the title of an anthology that is supposed to be putting forth some serious arguments. Huh. Maybe it's not poking fun/derogatory, so much as reclaiming it, a la "Cunt." ?

Anyway, just wondering if by chance one of you have heard the book mentioned in any GWS classes or organizations and could give me insight before I track it down and dive in.

Question two: have you all heard anything about the recent episode of America's Top Model called "Beautiful Corpes" that featured models posing as victims of crime scenes? It really was atrocious, but the good news is, it's under a lot of heat and has even found its way into the national (and world) media. I caught a few minutes of it while one of my roomates was watching, and the sad part is, I didn't quite realize how offended/shocked i should have been until i heard a feature on it on CNN a couple of days later. I guess I just somehow chalked it up to ridiculous shenanigans of American Reality TV when in fact it's much more serious than that. It reveals a lot of scary realities about our society that a project at this level of misogynism made it all the way past the planning stages and was actually implemented and broadcast nationwide.

here are the actual photos from the episode...SERIOUSLY, check out the images and the commentary by Tyra and Co. it is appalling.
http://www.zap2it.com/news/custom/photogallery/zap-photogallery-antm8-crimescenevictims,0,698280.photogallery?coll=zap-photogalleries&index=1

and here's a link to the women's blog that did an impressive job at generating widespread attention to the show: yay for that!
http://www.wimnonline.org/WIMNsVoicesBlog/?p=467

i hope you all are enjoying your weekend.

-- jo

Friday, March 30, 2007

Some Headlines

Well this won't be much of a post, only a few news headlines of interest and a thought.

In the Trib today, they ran a story about the University stopping the sales of chief shirts etc.

Story: http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-070330chief,1,6286619.story?coll=chi-news-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true

Tuesday a few Senators led the attempts at reintroducing the ERA to Congress.

Story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070327/ap_on_fe_st/sex_change_alimony


And this is bullshit: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070327/ap_on_fe_st/sex_change_alimony


Ok Im off to the hinterlands of Ohio. Peace and Love.

Monday, March 26, 2007

Big Ups to Brooklyn

hello fine peoples,

I don't have much but check it out yo!
Brooklyn Museum recently opened the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art with an exhibition entitled Global Feminisms. I particularly like this photography piece entitled Bind by Ryoko Suzuki.

From the artist:
"The idea of "pig is cute" was implanted in me by adults through a cartoon, the "Three Little Pigs." However, breeding pigs I saw at a pig farm, when I was a child, were so huge and ferocious that I could never find any cuteness in them. That was the first time I realized that the fairytale world was far from the reality, and I felt betrayed by adults. That is why I employ the "Three Little Pigs" as a symbol of lies and fictions given by adults, which become exposed sooner or later in the process of a child's growth.

The "Bind" series expresses my inner self; a grown-up who left the world given by my parents and other adults and acquired my own thinking, and a woman who has to deal with the female sexuality. In the series, I bound myself with pigskin, which has been soaked in blood as a symbol of womanhood, as a symbol of the given world. I was thinking of my life, in which I had transformed from a child who just took what adults provided, to a woman who led her own life, while I wrapped up my eyes, nose, mouth, and ears with the pigskin. The series is a record of this action."
—Ryoko Suzuki

Check out more exhibition highlights:
Any thoughts?
Peace and Love.

Monday, March 19, 2007

"When someone says logic, I think of science, and I also think of men."

I was on the old YouTube last night and look what I found:
(Link: http://youtube.com/watch?v=TOCkNCjb--k )

This guy is a piece of work. He's like the modern day poster child for liberal humanism. The Bill Nye for racist, classist, heteronormative, sexist scientific discourse...

Science as a discourse. I should write more but Ive got to run. Talk amongst yourselves.

"without feminism, i do think that women would still have the rights they have today. i dont think feminism needed to be around to fight for their rights. That would have happened anyway. You can be certain of one thing, we would have had a lot less man hating polemy, we wouldnt have had such discriminatory laws against men now, wed be in a much happier place, and there would be much less animosity between the genders. Feminism is a hate movement. All it does is try to bring men down and build women up and teach them to hate men and have contempt for men."

Peace and Love.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

el primer.

This is the first post. Holler.

I picked the title "Gut the House" as a little throwback to the Audre Lorde speech "The Master's Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master's House". It's one of my favorites, yo. I bounced between this as the title and an old Bikini Kill song called, Jigsaw Youth. So if by general consensus we like that title better I can do the old switcheroo. Or if there are any other suggestions, throw them this way.....

Yo, so I just watched the documentary Jesus Camp. I don't know if anyone's seen it or not but you SHOULD.

I'm 60% disturbed, 40% amused. They use the rhetoric of 'war' throughout the whole thing: Good vs. Evil, god vs. satan. It evokes the same rhetoric used within the fight to preserve "American Family Values" and the "nuclear family" which basically means convoluted WASP moral righteousness and a blatant disregard for non-normative lifestyles. The imagery of this vulnerable moral and virtuous entity that seeks preservation at all costs allows for this idea of a war to plant itself into the minds of the religious right. It seems to give a sense of meaning, a sense of almost certainty and validation. The film highlights the way this rhetoric is used to cajole children into these 'armies of the lord'.

It also addresses the issue of religion and the state, which brings to mind a book I just had to read for Queer Studies called, Love the Sin. I think it was by Janet Jakobsen and Ann Pellegrini. I've got it still, so if you want to borrow it: shout at me. Literally, shout. Im serious. Hah. No but really, they presented this really fresh argument that paralleled the arguement for sexual freedom to the constitutional right for religious freedom. Both are vested in both practice and identity. The arguments they employ do a great deal to sidestep problems "born that way" arguments sometimes fall into (ie: protection under the law of indentity and not practice-"Love the sinner, not the sin"). They hold that you cant separate identity and practice because the two are so intimately fused. I could go on, but I'll keep it short for length's sake.

Anyway for real, its a fresh read and I thoroughly recommend.

A link to watch Jesus Camp:
http://www.alluc.org/alluc/movies.html?action=getviewcategory&category_uid=5795
(click on full and it will bring you to a new page)

-I'm glad to see that Nestle has been made the official baptismal water of the lord.
-The anti-choice man in the red shirt sounds like Macho Man Randy Savage.
-I particularly enjoy the quote at the very end that goes something like 'equality for everyone will destroy us!".
-I'm also happy that the director of the camp has found good use for the blood-dripping font on Microsoft Word. Phew!

Peace and Love,
Stephanie Una Murphy