Wednesday, May 2, 2007

came about this today. it made me feel a bit downtrodden, but then i realized that there are a number of people committed to their own noble endeavors and for this i am very very thankful. they deserve more credit. holler.

Higher Education Conformity
By Barbara Ehrenreich, Barbaraehrenreich.com. Posted May 2, 2007. (via Alternet.org)


Can you be fired for doing a great job, year after year, and in fact becoming nationally known for your insight and performance? Yes, as in the case of Marilee Jones, who was the dean of admissions at MIT until her dismissal last week, when it was discovered that she had lied about her academic credentials 28 years ago. She had claimed three degrees, although she had none. If she had done a miserable job as dean, MIT might have been more forgiving, but her very success has to be threatening to an institution of higher learning: What good are educational credentials anyway?

Jones is hardly the only academic fraud. The outplacement firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas estimates that 10-30 percent of resumes include distortions if not outright lies. In the last couple of weeks, for example, "Dr. Denis Waitley Ph.D." -- as he is redundantly listed in the bestselling self-help book The Secret, where he appears as a spiritual teacher -- has confessed to not having his claimed master's degree, and the multi-level vitamin marketing firm he worked for admits that it can't confirm the Ph.D. either.

All right, lying is a grievous sin, as everyone outside of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue knows. And we wouldn't want a lot of fake MIT engineering graduates designing our bridges. But there are ways in which the higher education industry is becoming a racket: Buy our product or be condemned to life of penury, and our product can easily cost well over $100,000.

The pundits keep chanting that we need a more highly skilled workforce, by which they mean more college graduates, although the connection between college and skills is not always crystal clear. Jones, for example, was performing a complex job requiring considerable judgment, experience and sensitivity without the benefit of any college degree. And how about all those business majors -- business being the most popular undergraduate major in America? It seems to me that a two-year course in math and writing skills should be more than sufficient to prepare someone for a career in banking, marketing, or management. Most of what you need to know you're going to learn on the job anyway.

But in the last three decades the percentage of jobs requiring at least some college has doubled, which means that employers are going along with the college racket. A resume without a college degree is never going to get past the computer programs that screen applications. Why? Certainly it's not because most corporate employers possess a deep affinity for the life of the mind. In fact in his book Executive Blues G. J. Meyers warned of the "academic stench" that can sink a career: That master's degree in English? Better not mention it.

My theory is that employers prefer college grads because they see a college degree chiefly as mark of one's ability to obey and conform. Whatever else you learn in college, you learn to sit still for long periods while appearing to be awake. And whatever else you do in a white collar job, most of the time you'll be sitting and feigning attention. Sitting still for hours on end -- whether in library carrels or office cubicles -- does not come naturally to humans. It must be learned -- although no college has yet been honest enough to offer a degree in seat-warming.

Or maybe what attracts employers to college grads is the scent of desperation. Unless your parents are rich and doting, you will walk away from commencement with a debt averaging $20,000 and no health insurance. Employers can safely bet that you will not be a trouble-maker, a whistle-blower or any other form of non-"team-player." You will do anything. You will grovel.

College can be the most amazingly enlightening experience of a lifetime. I loved almost every minute of it, from St. Augustine to organic chemistry, from Chaucer to electricity and magnetism. But we need a distinguished blue ribbon commission to investigate its role as a toll booth on the road to employment, and the obvious person to head up this commission is Marilee Jones.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This article makes me so sad as the throng of business majors plod past me at the library. Is it true? Has college become a four year preparation for the bureacracy of a capitalist self-serving society. Please tell me that some of us really enjoy learning. I do not view the cultivation of intellect to be an exercise in my "ability to obey and conform". Why do we look for the end-product? What about the inquiries, the adventure of it all, the pure joy in the ability to access information and wield ourselves about it. Or on the other side, what about the access to other kinds of information that don't get valued by this society. If the university is not a space for the pursuit of knowledge, but an assembly line of docile employees, what are we left with? A generation that capitulates to administrations, boardrooms, and corner offices?


Why not herald those who pursue a different path? Exalt your GWS majors! Find solace in those who are just resolute enough to see that they can not pursue a life that speaks in terms of utilitarian benefits and losses, those of us who find no solace in using an education solely as a means to a strategic employment end, but who seek virtue and promise in the notion that education can provoke those potentials within ourselves to make change, and to transform ruminations into realities.




2 comments:

bridget said...

I've had this discussion before... college should be four years of liberal arts and learning how to think and question, and if you want specialized career training you can do that separately. That's why I left the education department after freshman year... and look, I still get to be a teacher! And I'll be a teacher with a much broader knowledge base on which to draw in my teaching. It makes total sense to me to do it that way... but then, I guess that's why I chose it.

We talked about this in feminist theory, and I'm sad that I can't remember details of it from two years ago... but it came down to the increasingly specialized kinds of knowledge that are cultivated in higher learning and the ways they siphon people into narrow ranges of possible careers. power and knowledge and all that jazz.

Go Ask Alex said...

I totally agree with you, Bridget. I always hate it when people ask me "Whatever are you going to do with THAT???!!" when I tell them that I'm an English major and a GWS minor. And I also hate it when people tell me that I have "no marketable skills" because I'm not in business or marketing or anything else like that. Not meaning to offend the field of business, as I do have relatives who have pursued that field and really liked it.

I do think that colleges should offer the broadest range of programs possible in order to give their students the most complete, most well-rounded experience they possibly can, not just prime them for something they see as profitable. Liberal arts are a good starting point because they do teach people to think for themselves and question. That can help people to pick their career choices themselves.